Sunday, June 28, 2015

Love Wins

It saddens me when I see people use the Bible to pick on a group of people. The Christian experience with the homosexual community reflects this.

Pointing to the Bible, many Christians say homosexuality is bad. But the same book also condemns many other things, then changes its mind later on. Or, sometimes we ignore Biblical rules outright. Christians, it seems, hate to admit this.

I don't think it's so simple to point to the handful of verses about homosexuality and say, "Aha! It's bad!"

In a nutshell, I'm not convinced homosexuality is some great evil, because....


1. The Bible is not clear what 'sin' is. If anything, there is a shifting standard.

Polygamy
It's overlooked in the Old Testament, if not outrightly condoned. Jacob had two wives and two child-bearing servants. Their children became the basis of the 12 tribes of Israel. Further, David had a harem of at least 10 concubines (2 Samuel 15:16) and Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (I Kings 11:3).

Yet, the Bible later discourages polygamy. 
(See, e.g., I Timothy 3:2). So what about these great men of the Bible?


Warfare
It's commanded at the time of Joshua, then heavily discouraged by Jesus' teachings on the Sermon on the Mount. See e.g., "Blessed are the peacemakers" and "turn the other cheek" against violence. (Matthew 5:9, 39).


Civilian massacres
This was also commanded for Joshua, but incompatible with the words of Jesus. The examples of Jesus' love for people are numerous, but "love thy neighbor as yourself" stands high for me. (Mark 12:31).


Tend the Garden
Mankind was to told to tend to the Garden (Genesis 2:15). Yet, God commanded Joshua to hamstring captured horses. (Joshua 11:6). This bothers me - why not just kill them?


Capital punishment
It's encouraged throughout the Mosaic Code, but then discouraged with the teachings of Jesus. Most notably, "let him who is without sin cast the first stone." (John 8:7).


Pork eating
It's prohibited according to the Leviticus dietary laws, but then it's not. Jesus even states that food has no spiritual effect. (Matthew 15:11, but also see Peter's vision of Acts 10).


Sabbath breaking
The first Sabbath breaker was stoned to death for collecting firewood. (Numbers 15:32-36). Then Jesus collected food in the field. (Mark 2:23-27). Relatedly, Joash, a Godly king, stationed soldiers on the Sabbath. (2 Kings 11:5-9).


Divorce
It's first accepted, then discouraged by Jesus in Matthew 19.


Lesson learned
From the above, I see a shift within the Bible to one of greater freedom.

The rationale for the divorce change is interesting. It was originally permitted because of the "hardness of your hearts." (Matthew 19: 8). In other words, it was a rule contextualized to the time.

What other rules in the Bible reflect another era's context and not something we should necessarily follow today?


There are others, which we take for granted today.


2. The shifting standard seeing the context for rules, if not ignoring them, remains today.

Slaves, obey your masters
Sorry, but the Bible commands this. (Ephesians 6:5). In the prelude to the American Civil War, American church denominations divided on the modern application of this rule. The Union's victory against the Confederacy determined which Biblical application American churches would follow.


Women should cover their heads during prayer 
Otherwise, it's akin to having her head shaved. (1 Cor. 11:5-6). The analogy to head shaving means that Paul didn't mean that hair alone was a suitable head covering for women. 

Aside from the East Orthodox tradition, modern churches regularly disregard this instruction.


Women should remain silent in churches
The churches that follow this rule limit it to female church leaders, but Paul clarifies he means absolute silence. If women don't understand something at church, they must ask their husbands at home. (1 Cor. 14:34-35).

Fortunately, churches do not gag women while they are at church.


Rape victims must marry their rapists

Although it appears in the Old Testament (Deut. 22:28-29), which most Christians splice apart anyway, it should caution us about the context and times in which Biblical rules appear. 

Fortunately, this is also ignored.


3. What about embracing 'sin' as a culture?
Some people think that legalizing homosexuality as a nation would be to endorse sin. Notwithstanding the Establishment Clause implications of laws based on religious morality, I find the United States celebrates a number of sins. In fact, it embeds them deep into the foundations of society.


Greed
The love of money is the root of all evils. (1 Timothy 6:10). Yet it is a force embedded deeply into market capitalism.


Rebellion
Samuel famously likened rebellion to witchcraft. (1 Samuel 15:23). Granted, in context, he may have referred to rebellion against God and not political rebellion. But certainly, the Bible speaks of obeying one's political authorities, such as giving "to Caesar what is Caesar's." (Mark 12:17).

As we all know, the United States was born of a political rebellion. We celebrate it, but I can't say it was a "Christian" thing to do.


Theft
"Thou shalt not steal" is one of the Ten Commandments. (Exodus 20:15). Yet, the United States as we know it was born of the theft of land. In our history, we broke land agreement treaties with the Native Americans, Mexico, and the Hawaiian monarchy for land, and enforced the land theft through military force.

We also supported our allies to steal land. This occurred in 1947 with the foundation of the modern state of Israel. Sorry to state the obvious, but this stole land from the Palestinians. Yet, many American Christians venerating America's partnership with Israel. By doing so, they validate and celebrate this sin.


4. What definition of 'sin' should we use that transcends time?

Evil exists. Don't get me wrong, I believe that. 

But God is also love. (1 John 4:8). Love does not harm. (Romans 13:10). We must remember these when we apply Biblical rules in the modern world. 

As for a good principle, does it love thy brother or cause harm? 


Sometimes enforcing a Biblical rule in the modern world would cause great harm. This post has many such examples.


5. Conclusion
I must also conclude that applying the Bible's rules against homosexuality would cause great harm in the modern world, particularly if one were born homosexual.

Love wins.

No comments:

Post a Comment